somandal commented on PR #10845:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/10845#issuecomment-1592272566

   > thank you for the contribution. @vvivekiyer and @somandal
   > 
   > could i ask a generic question what's the relationship between this PR and 
#10846? i guess specifically how do i review them? should i download both, 
cherry-pick/merge together and try at the same time? please share your 
thoughts. many thanks!
   
   @walterddr yes these two PRs should ideally be reviewed together. 
https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/10846 is the planner side changes 
necessary for this feature. Keep in mind that we haven't yet added support for 
function arguments as literals etc which are heavily used for some of our 
aggregation functions (and this will be done as part of phase 2). 
   Merging together may not be enough, since this PR creates a new aggregation 
operator. A small code change will be required to call the aggregation operator 
in this PR rather than the existing `AggregateOperator`. Hope this makes sense, 
let us know if you have any more questions


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@pinot.apache.org

Reply via email to