jugomezv commented on code in PR #9994:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/9994#discussion_r1060219667
##########
pinot-common/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/common/metrics/ServerGauge.java:
##########
@@ -45,8 +45,10 @@ public enum ServerGauge implements AbstractMetrics.Gauge {
// Dedup metrics
DEDUP_PRIMARY_KEYS_COUNT("dedupPrimaryKeysCount", false),
CONSUMPTION_QUOTA_UTILIZATION("ratio", false),
- JVM_HEAP_USED_BYTES("bytes", true);
-
+ JVM_HEAP_USED_BYTES("bytes", true),
+ // Lag metrics
+ MAX_CONSUMPTION_DELAY_MS("milliseconds", false),
Review Comment:
Yes, makes sense to add the TABLE prefix to both and settle on ingestion
delay naming everywhere
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@pinot.apache.org
