atris commented on a change in pull request #8016:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/8016#discussion_r786543070



##########
File path: 
pinot-segment-local/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/segment/local/utils/nativefst/mutablefst/MutableFST.java
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *   http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
+ * software distributed under the License is distributed on an
+ * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
+ * KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
+ * specific language governing permissions and limitations
+ * under the License.
+ */
+
+package org.apache.pinot.segment.local.utils.nativefst.mutablefst;
+
+
+/**
+ * A mutable FST represents a FST which can have arbitrary inputs added to it 
at
+ * any given point of time. Unlike a normal FST which is build once read many, 
mutable
+ * FST can be concurrently written to and read from. Mutable FST provides real 
time search
+ * i.e. search will see words as they are added without needing a flush.
+ *
+ * Unlike a normal FST, mutable FST does not require the entire input 
beforehand nor
+ * does it require the input to be sorted. Single word additions work well with
+ * mutable FST.
+ *
+ * The reason as to why normal FST and mutable FST have different interfaces 
is because

Review comment:
       > Does this mean that there will have to be separate code to use mutable 
vs immutable FST? An abstraction that avoids that would be great.
   
   That's a great point. However, here is the catch. Immutable and Mutable 
FSTs, while providing the same functionality, follow different data structures. 
It is pretty hard to get them to agree on one interface without significantly 
compromising ImmutableFST's serialised state optimisations or Mutable FST's 
speed of addition of new paths.
   
   However, any layer above pinot-segment will not be aware of this difference. 
Referring to the proposal document above, the integration path for mutable FST 
will include a native FST reader which will propagate a query to both mutable 
and immutable FSTs(within a segment) at the same time.




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@pinot.apache.org

Reply via email to