jadami10 commented on PR #16254: URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/16254#issuecomment-3050959315
We don't use `RecordTransformer`, so that's fine. We do use both `MULTIPLE_RECORDS_KEY` and `SKIP_RECORD_KEY`. I don't see any replacement for `SKIP_RECORD_KEY` here. Is there a reason we're making such a big change in 1 PR? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@pinot.apache.org
