tstellar added a comment. In D120305#3347143 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D120305#3347143>, @MaskRay wrote:
> In D120305#3347142 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D120305#3347142>, @tstellar > wrote: > >> In D120305#3347139 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D120305#3347139>, @MaskRay >> wrote: >> >>> In D120305#3347109 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D120305#3347109>, @tstellar >>> wrote: >>> >>>> [...] >>>> The issue here has nothing to do with the technical merits of the patch or >>>> what the root cause of the problem is. The policy for this project is >>>> that if you commit a patch that breaks someone's configuration (especially >>>> a buildbot), then it needs to be fixed quickly or reverted. I get that >>>> this policy can be frustrating as a committer when you feel your patch is >>>> correct, and the real problem is elsewhere, but this is still the policy >>>> and it should be followed. >>> >>> 7 hours ago my >>> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-zorg/commit/b6ddf02ce3a54da2df29e7e599b1838167e0e3ad >>> was sufficient to fix the issue and was the suggested fix in my opinion. >>> Unfortunately nobody on the PowerPC side made the change effective in the >>> build bot. Rather, I received such a heated message >>> (https://reviews.llvm.org/D120305#3347058). >>> It was another way to fix the redness (revert) but IMO not justified. >> >> I feel like we are talking past each other at this point, but in general >> changing the buildbot configuration is not an acceptable solution to a >> broken bot. Did the bot owner approve that change? > > Unsure why it isn't acceptable. There is fairly strong evidence that that > specific ppc64le buildbot has a stability issue and > `-DCLANG_DEFAULT_PIE_ON_LINUX=OFF` keeps it as if before this CMake patch. > We can always discuss this with @nemanjai in another place, e.g. in IRC if we > want to stop bothering others subscribing to this thread. It's not acceptable, because buildbots are meant to represent a specific configuration that the buildbot owner cares about. Changing the buildbot configuration makes the buildbot no longer useful to them since it is now testing something different. For example, if someone is running production builds that used the same configuration as the buildbot, those production builds are still broken even though the buildbot is green. Configuration changes like this need to have approval of the bot owner. I still don't understand why you can't revert the patch. I've encountered this same situation numerous times while working on this project and no one has ever objected this much to doing a revert. The fact that this is the second time this has happened is concerning to me. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D120305/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D120305 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
