MaskRay added a comment.

In D120305#3347109 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D120305#3347109>, @tstellar wrote:

> [...]
> The issue here has nothing to do with the technical merits of the patch or 
> what the root cause of the problem is.  The policy for this project is that 
> if you commit a patch that breaks someone's configuration (especially a 
> buildbot), then it needs to be fixed quickly or reverted.  I get that this 
> policy can be frustrating as a committer when you feel your patch is correct, 
> and the real problem is elsewhere, but this is still the policy and it should 
> be followed.

7 hours ago my 
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-zorg/commit/b6ddf02ce3a54da2df29e7e599b1838167e0e3ad
 was sufficient to fix the issue and was the suggested fix in my opinion.
Unfortunately nobody on the PowerPC side made the change effective in the build 
bot. Rather, I received such a heated message 
(https://reviews.llvm.org/D120305#3347058).
It was another to fix the redness (revert) but IMO not justified.

And I think I need to push back such request as otherwise the red bot is going 
to waste other contributors' time (see my previous links on "Success Rate").
OK, that took me our hour to reply as a non-native speaker, forgetting that I 
probably should try harder to fix the issue.

Anyway, I find that my previous disabling tests attempt was actually effective. 
274ec425dcc3e3f637dd006c5e9ae33bd0e2e917 
<https://reviews.llvm.org/rG274ec425dcc3e3f637dd006c5e9ae33bd0e2e917> should 
have appeased https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/57


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D120305/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D120305

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to