MyDeveloperDay added a comment. In D69764#2935269 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D69764#2935269>, @erichkeane wrote:
> In D69764#2935218 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D69764#2935218>, @MyDeveloperDay > wrote: > >> In D69764#2934666 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D69764#2934666>, @erichkeane >> wrote: >> >>>> Someone internally pointed out the anti-inclusivity of the terminology, so >>>> I figured I'd bring it up. >> >> I apologise if I'm proliferating that, but could you educate me why its >> "anti-inclusive" I certainly didn't mean any offence in its use. >> >> I'm absolutely OK about dropping east/west especially if we think its going >> to cause offence and we just want to avoid that. > > I apologize in advance to anyone reading this who is affected by this, or > knows more about this than I, but my understanding is that > "west==left/east==right" propagates the legitimacy of a 'north up' map that > was created as a response to the at-the-time-south-up maps having Africa/Asia > "above" Europe. The result is (I think?) a propagation of a > euro-centric/euro-supremacy ideology. > > Again, thats my 'ELI5' understanding of it. Thank you I didn't know anything about that, so lets agree I'll make the changes to remove East/West to avoid any such issues. I might even gain a few fractions of a point from @aaron.ballman CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D69764/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D69764 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
