MyDeveloperDay added a comment.
> I find it weird that we aren't handling ALL of the CV qualifiers. I will probably try and address this, I do have some ideas, but this will I believe complicate the implementation. For now I really want to understand if conceptually such a feature can be landed, not so much land it in entirely this form. if I can get some agreement and that really means that people need to generally be in agreement. > From a "we should be inclusive" perspective, my understanding is that > east==right, west==left is considered by some to be euro-centric due to its > north-up bias. I don't feel strongly about it, but it at least gives me a > somewhat significant preference for left/right vs east/west. I think this is partially historical because I was following the whole east const vs west const (https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/master/CppCoreGuidelines.md#Rl-const,https://mariusbancila.ro/blog/2018/11/23/join-the-east-const-revolution/, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fv--IKZFVO8). I don't have a problem supporting one/both or either, I tend to think that is more arguing semantics. After seeing those videos I wanted clang-format to end the east vs west war, like clang-format ended the whitespace war!,.... I didn't realise I'd cause a clang war in the process! oops!! ;-) CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D69764/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D69764 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
