MyDeveloperDay added a comment.
> I was referring to @rsmith and @aaron.ballman (to clarify), both are > maintainers in 'clang', the former of which is the 'superset' maintainer of > this format project based on its directory. While Aaron is a peer-maintainer > to this project, his contributions are immense, and his points are > too-well-reasoned and motivated to be dismissed. Just so we are clear I'm not dismissing anyone opinions, @arron.ballman and I have been going at this quite a bit both on and off list. I have huge respect for these people, (even if the defence of my review it might not seem so). I can't even think to emulate their contributions. Ideally I'd like their blessing, but alas I fear that might be beyond my capabilities, but if there are things like the RFC that could even go some way to potentially them seeing a way forward that is mutually beneficial so that the door is even open a jar for this then I'm happy to try. If ultimately the answer is "no" then I need to understand what can be done if anything, if that means a new tool then I'm ok with that as the compromise. Out right dismissal, I would be very sorry to see. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D69764/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D69764 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
