erichkeane added a comment. In D69764#2934646 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D69764#2934646>, @MyDeveloperDay wrote:
>> I find it weird that we aren't handling ALL of the CV qualifiers. > > I will probably try and address this, I do have some ideas, but this will I > believe complicate the implementation. For now I really want to understand if > conceptually such a feature can be landed, not so much land it in entirely > this form. if I can get some agreement and that really means that people need > to generally be in agreement. Understood. >> From a "we should be inclusive" perspective, my understanding is that >> east==right, west==left is considered by some to be euro-centric due to its >> north-up bias. I don't feel strongly about it, but it at least gives me a >> somewhat significant preference for left/right vs east/west. > > I think this is partially historical because I was following the whole east > const vs west const > (https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/master/CppCoreGuidelines.md#Rl-const,https://mariusbancila.ro/blog/2018/11/23/join-the-east-const-revolution/, > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fv--IKZFVO8). I don't have a problem > supporting one/both or either, I tend to think that is more arguing semantics. > > After seeing those videos I wanted clang-format to end the east vs west war, > like clang-format ended the whitespace war!,.... I didn't realise I'd cause a > clang war in the process! oops!! ;-) I understand the origin of east/west in this case, I was around when those bracelets came out :) Someone internally pointed out the anti-inclusivity of the terminology, so I figured I'd bring it up. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D69764/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D69764 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
