Paulo Scardine wrote: > thomas schorpp escreveu: >> >> history showed such things have been always replacements since M$ >> stole X-Windows and other stuff from MIT. >> > FYI Microsoft stole GUI design from Apple, who stole it from Xerox PARC... > I assume the rest of your statements have similar accuracy.
wheres the evidence? >>> I saw a developer politely asking if there would be interesting on >>> some alternative proprietary well-written SIP stack. >>> >> >> how do You know "well-written" if closed source? >> >> > Please, read "100% RFC compliant" instead. i read what i want, thank You. >>> The answer is YES, there are people who want this kind of support >>> specially if bundled with the patent encumbered codecs that will not >>> make into callweaver any time soon. >>> >> >> stay on topic pls. codecs are not in a session initiation protocol (SIP). >> and we shouldn't give a shit on that U.S. lawyers trivial software >> patents bullshit. >> besides, the community has nearly always managed to give >> reverse-engineered and clean room designed replacements for codecs, >> since mp3 times. > We who, white-skin? Don't you know the core developers position on this > matter? There are already free implementations of some patent encumbered > codecs in the wide, but they will not be included in callweaver until > the patents expire, period. i acknowledge You called me a racist. my brasillian neighbour next door just asked me what kind of brasillian developer You are and laughed ;) include it Yourself or do You always rely on official advisory and delivery? open source wont prevent You from. > > Also some of the patents in question where granted over HARDWARE > implementations, so the question if software patents are enforcible on > your particular jurisdiction is not even relevant. >>> For many people, callweaver will not be a viable alternative to >>> asterisk without this. Some folk will not buy the GNU-fundamentalist >>> "just make your provider use speex" argument. >>> >> >> all my providers here use PCMA (G711a). just don't support providers >> restricting to unfree codecs at all. they stink like skype. >> >> > You just made the argument I told you some people don't buy. buy what You want. but dont complain if You've to wait months for extra paid "hotfixes" of proprietary stuff as usual. >>> I hope you have not scared the man. :-) >>> >> >> he must take it. this sounds like censorship > How rude!. thats NOT rude :o > > Regards, > -- > Paulo > y tom _______________________________________________ Callweaver-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-dev
