Thanks a lot for your inputs. I will check with Marijn regarding that.
Br, Mani On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Boudewijn Rempt <b...@valdyas.org> wrote: > On Wednesday 02 February 2011, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > > > Just a thought: > > BTW, do we want to consider having separate git repo for the > > alternative GUIs, or even one-per gui? With the current infrastructure > > it's quite easy. And this could show the 3rd-parties that there APIs > > allow for such development, and the code is not a monolith. > > Well, it still is, rather a monolith. And we definitely don't export enough > headers yet. Personally, I'd prefer to have a nice range of alternative > gui's all in this project to show interested people what's possible -- and > then have even more gui's out of tree. > > This also ties in with my fosdem talk, of course :-). > > > Forking-to-learn could be then easier than forking the whole Calligra > > (e.g. easier/faster merges). > > This is in particular question to maemo/meego devs. > > -- > Boudewijn Rempt | http://www.valdyas.org, http://www.krita.org > _______________________________________________ > calligra-devel mailing list > calligra-devel@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel > -- Mani Chandrasekar
_______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
