On Wednesday 02 February 2011, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > Just a thought: > BTW, do we want to consider having separate git repo for the > alternative GUIs, or even one-per gui? With the current infrastructure > it's quite easy. And this could show the 3rd-parties that there APIs > allow for such development, and the code is not a monolith.
Well, it still is, rather a monolith. And we definitely don't export enough headers yet. Personally, I'd prefer to have a nice range of alternative gui's all in this project to show interested people what's possible -- and then have even more gui's out of tree. This also ties in with my fosdem talk, of course :-). > Forking-to-learn could be then easier than forking the whole Calligra > (e.g. easier/faster merges). > This is in particular question to maemo/meego devs. -- Boudewijn Rempt | http://www.valdyas.org, http://www.krita.org _______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
