On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 06:29:50PM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote: > > Are you willing to do reasonable discussion, or is this just going to be a > > claim without justification? > > I'm giving you a very accurate prediction, and being lazy about explaining > the responses I know you will get if you ask for it. Feel free to > experience it for yourself if you don't want to take my word for it. If > you propose it to libc and linux developers, you will get explanations > aplenty. I'd be happy to discuss ways that might actually fly to address > the problem that motivated your idea.
I can count you as a libc developer, but this issue actualy seems to belong to Linux developers, so I'll deal with them and get their explanation. > Like I said, it would be perfectly reasonable on debian-hurd or other > debian lists to discuss ways to prevent packages from being built without > being fixed or annotated properly. This doesn't belong on bug-hurd, which > is about systems where no <linux/*.h> header file exists. Ok. I understand this is off-topic and leave it here. -- Robert Millan "[..] but the delight and pride of Aule is in the deed of making, and in the thing made, and neither in possession nor in his own mastery; wherefore he gives and hoards not, and is free from care, passing ever on to some new work." -- J.R.R.T, Ainulindale (Silmarillion) _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
