Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Why CC bug-hurd? This has nothing at all to do with the Hurd. It doesn't > > affect us at all what the linux headers contain, so please don't give a > > wrong impression. > > I believe you're not looking at it from the perspective of a porter who > has to fix hundreds of broken packages which include <linux/*.h>. Please > do that and my point will be made obvious.
Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't debian-hurd for porting issues? Anyway, just keep irritating people some Hurd related list is the wrong list is just bureaucratic, sorry for that. I just don't understand what glibc has to do with improving the way people code, especially when dealing with linux header files. I understand your frustration, but I do not think this just is the right way to fix the problem IMHO. As usual, please correct me if I'm wrong. -- Marco _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
