> Are you willing to do reasonable discussion, or is this just going to be a > claim without justification?
I'm giving you a very accurate prediction, and being lazy about explaining the responses I know you will get if you ask for it. Feel free to experience it for yourself if you don't want to take my word for it. If you propose it to libc and linux developers, you will get explanations aplenty. I'd be happy to discuss ways that might actually fly to address the problem that motivated your idea. > I'm involved in boring porting tasks that you're not. I do avoid it now, but don't think I haven't done years of it in the hardest times for it and deeply appreciate the kinds of things you want. > And I'm so tired to go through the same crap over and over just because > we allow programmers to do really insane things they should never do. Like I said, it would be perfectly reasonable on debian-hurd or other debian lists to discuss ways to prevent packages from being built without being fixed or annotated properly. This doesn't belong on bug-hurd, which is about systems where no <linux/*.h> header file exists. _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd