On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 07:35:31PM +0000, Robert Millan wrote: > On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 07:13:32PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 06:05:13PM +0000, Robert Millan wrote: > > > I think we should disallow direct inclusion of <linux/*.h> in Glibc, any > > > comments? > > > > There don't exist any <linux/*.h> headers in glibc, they come from > > Linux. > > IIRC, Glibc build process takes them from specified location and installs them > in /usr/include/linux/. > > So there's room to apply some patches.
No they don't. Some distribution put those headers in a package called glibc, but glibc itself doesn't do anything with them (except using it in the glibc code itself of course). Jeroen Dekkers _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
