Simon Josefsson wrote: > Another consideration is license proliferation.
License proliferation is bad because - it creates incompatibilities, - it creates doubt about the intent. > But at least please let's not create a new variation > of these existing variants: > > https://spdx.org/licenses/FSFAP.html > https://spdx.org/licenses/FSFAP-no-warranty-disclaimer.html > https://spdx.org/licenses/FSFUL.html > https://spdx.org/licenses/FSFULLR.html > https://spdx.org/licenses/FSFULLRWD.html Here they have already 5 variations. We have been using the FSFULLR variant so far. It will not cost them much to add a 6th one, like FSFULLRWD just with a shorter second sentence. I don't see how that would - create incompatibilities, or - create doubt about the intent. So we should we fine, even if some people need to update their pattern- matcher used for automated SPDX classification. Bruno
