> The all-permissive copyright + license notice that we currently use is: > > dnl Copyright (C) YEARS Free Software Foundation, Inc. > dnl This file is free software; the Free Software Foundation > dnl gives unlimited permission to copy and/or distribute it, > dnl with or without modifications, as long as this notice is preserved. > > since 2005 [1]. > > Meanwhile, in 2020, John Darrington suggested to me to use a different > all-permissive license notice [2], that has the additional sentence > > This file is offered as-is, without any warranty. > > Should we use or not use this additional sentence?
I'm not a lawyer (fortunately!), but the resulting terms sound exactly like the MIT license. -- Michele
