Ah, and mine are easily translatable... at least in Dutch. ;-) -- Jord van der Elst.
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Jord van der Elst <[email protected]> wrote: > Task xx_yy_zz running as preference, trying to meet the deadline. > Task xx_yy_zz running in precedence, trying to meet the deadline. > > Seeing how we do want to tell that it's a status in order of > importance or urgency, we may want to go for the second one. > > -- Jord van der Elst. > > > On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 4:44 PM, David Anderson <[email protected]> wrote: >> I think anything containing "priority" will create confusion >> with OS priority. >> >> The other problem with showing this info is that it creates the >> erroneous impression that the job's project will get more than >> its fair share of computing. >> Several projects report that when they use short job deadlines >> (which create "high priority" jobs) they get lots of user complaints. >> >> So I'm in favor of not showing this in the GUI; >> maybe we can show it in the event log in some better way. >> >> -- D >> >> On 03-Oct-2014 3:24 PM, Jacob Klein wrote: >>> >>> I'd like to see "Prioritized to meet deadline" in the UI, next to >>> "Running". >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> From: Richard Haselgrove<mailto:[email protected]> >>> Sent: 10/3/2014 9:19 AM >>> To: McLeod, John<mailto:[email protected]>; >>> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >>> Subject: Re: [boinc_dev] High priority status message removed. >>> >>> The removal followed a question and answer session at the BOINC workshop >>> in Budapest earlier this week. The OS scheduler mis-interpretation was one >>> that I highlighted, but there was also a problem with users thinking that >>> High Priority was a project-chosen queue-jumping facility. I think we're >>> much better off without those confusions over terminology, but I agree with >>> John that it would be good if the reason for non-FIFO running could be >>> marked in some way - if we can find a less-frightening word. >>> >>> >>> >>>> ________________________________ >>>> From: "McLeod, John" <[email protected]> >>>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>>> Sent: Friday, October 3, 2014 2:01 PM >>>> Subject: [boinc_dev] High priority status message removed. >>>> >>>> >>>> OK, High Priority made it sound like it was running at High OS Scheduler >>>> Priority, but some tag that it is not in the normal RR schedule might be >>>> good for helping diagnose problems. >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> boinc_dev mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev >>>> To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and >>>> (near bottom of page) enter your email address. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> boinc_dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev >>> To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and >>> (near bottom of page) enter your email address. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> boinc_dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev >>> To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and >>> (near bottom of page) enter your email address. >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> boinc_dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev >> To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and >> (near bottom of page) enter your email address. _______________________________________________ boinc_dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and (near bottom of page) enter your email address.
