> ----- Original Message ----- > From: akhiezer <[email protected]> > ...You mentioned that earlier, too - if not current-approach then windows. > Would you consider a seamonkey build on linux as an intermediately-acceptable > solution for seeing flash in (and use uzbl or whatever as your main browser), > between on the one hand your present approach, and on the other hand going to > windows? Seems a bit of an unnecessary jump between the latter two, when the > intermediate option of flash-via-seamonkey-on-linux works very simply.
For this old, underpowered laptop I doubt that seamonkey would be a good idea. I will keep it in mind, but as a last resort. My next project will be a LFS build on my other, more powerful (currently windows based) machine. If the same problem occurrs there then yes, seamonkey would be worth trying. Many thanks, R. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
