Em 28-04-2014 13:37, Pierre Labastie escreveu: > Le 28/04/2014 17:34, Fernando de Oliveira a écrit :
Sorry, I was not liking the idea of building everything again. > OK, I just wanted to discuss, so that we agree on something, not to oblige > anybody to do anything. Understood. > Maybe I am just too anxious. As you say, everything may settle down when we > come to release stable versions. OTOH, if, because we do not use the same > versions of LFS, we put the book into an inconsistent state, that may be > difficult to debug. It has always been like that. But you are correct. This time the changes are so important that depending on the version many many things are different. > For now, I'll finish updating BLFS's gcc to 4.9.0, then build today's or > tomorrow's version of LFS, and test that the current BLFS book builds (using > automation as much as possible). I use automation for LFS, never for BLFS, unfortunately. I think that you, Bruce, Ken and I will be using each on a different LFS-svn. The reason for this reply is to say that you are correct. Next time of a big LFS change, we all could agree on which svn version to use. I don't remember what was done, before LFS-7.0 release. I am using: $ cat /etc/lfs-release SVN-20140425 but it seems that there are not so big differences from SVN-20140428. So, please, accept my apologies. -- []s, Fernando -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
