Em 28-04-2014 08:38, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: > Em 28-04-2014 06:01, Bruce Dubbs escreveu:
>> For lfs-7.5 and lfs-7.4 there are blfs versions to accompany those >> versions. We are changing LFS in a fairly dramatic way and BLFS has to >> change to accommodate it. >> >> If we split lfs in to separate systemd and traditional books and also >> did the same for blfs, it would satisfy some users, but we don't have >> the manpower to do that. In addition, we would lose something. The >> differences between the builds is really quite small. >> >> Fernando and I did some talking and I investigated polkit in particular. >> The effect of systemd is zero. They've linked in two calls that force >> linking the library, but the effect is absolutely zero. Its a >> placeholder right now, probably for future use. The >> --enable-libsystemd-login is only there to satisfy the build requirements. > > I am running and prefer sysV, not systd. But with new LFS, it is > necessary to make BLFS compatible. > > I would prefer tow versions of LFS and two of BLFS. However, Bruce's > research leading to LFS hybrid is a good one and should not be lost. > > We do not have enough manpower to maintain two BLFS. > > My particular point of view(s) is (are) very similar to the akh's > (another thread post , earlier today), unfortunately, as written above, > we are doing what seems to be possible, with current status of LFS. One more thing. By request of Bruce, I stopped updating the book to build a new LFS-svn. I have already spent about three days with this LFS svn and it does not have yet the dependencies to update some of the open tickets. Before that, many packages needed fixes for svn, e.g., due to new readline, some fixe(s) have even been dropped, after svn patched readline. And during most that time I was using LFS-7.5. This is what has always happened, I believe for decades. One cannot stay with previous release and fix everything in 15 day for the next one. And finally, I doubt anybody wants to build many svn and aftwards, dependencies to update BLFS. I will stick to the one I am using now, will not spend another 3+ days building another svn, and do not want to oblige anyone else to use the same. Things will converge before next release, when we hopefully will have a BLFS-rc1 as well as LFS-rc1. Bruce certainly will use more recent versions than I do. -- []s, Fernando -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
