On Monday 06 September 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > "Unfortunately", there is no bug fixed by this patch. I can only > > offer the above argumentation (plus consistency of $testsrcdir > > and $top_testsrcdir). > > Your verbose explanation above and this seem to contradict each > other. ;-) I'll probably look like an idiot unable to understand basic humourism, but I have to ask... Why? The old code wasn't bugged, it was just uselessly redundant (which, mind it, is IMHO a good enough reason to accept the patch). Does this makes sens?
Thanks, and SIA (Sorry In Advance) for the proably stupid question. Stefano
