Hi Karen, This is OK with me.
Thanks, Ketan On Thu, Apr 2, 2026 at 2:53 AM Karen Moore <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Pascal and *Ketan (AD), > > Thanks for confirming that the additional updates made to Figures 18 and > 19 look good. > > *Ketan, please review the new updates to Figures 18 (Section 6.4.2) and 19 > (Section 6.4.3). Pascal said the tunnels are more isolated and the PDAO > messages are written in full, which should solve the NS issues. Please > review and let us know if you approve; see < > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9914-lastrfcdiff.html>. > > While we await a reply from Ketan, we will ask IANA to update their > registries to match the edited document. Once those updates have been made > and we have reviewed them, we will inform you. > > —Files (please refresh)— > > Updated XML file: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9914.xml > > Updated output files: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9914.txt > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9914.pdf > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9914.html > > Diff files showing all changes made during AUTH48: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9914-auth48diff.html > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9914-auth48rfcdiff.html (side by > side) > > Diff files showing only the changes made during the last edit round: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9914-lastdiff.html > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9914-lastrfcdiff.html (side by side) > > Diff files showing all changes: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9914-diff.html > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9914-rfcdiff.html (side by side) > > Thank you! > > Karen Moore > RFC Production Center > > > On Apr 1, 2026, at 12:38 PM, Pascal Thubert <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > All good to publish Karen! Many thanks ! > > > > A bientôt; > > > > Pascal > > > > Le 1 avr. 2026 à 20:13, Karen Moore <[email protected]> a > écrit : > > > > Hi Pascal and Michael, > > > > We have updated our files to reflect the changes to Figures 18 and 19 > that Pascal provided. Please review the updated files (in particular, the > changes are easy to view at < > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9914-lastrfcdiff.html>), and let us > know if this is agreeable or if any further changes are needed. > > > > Michael, we have noted your approval of the document on the AUTH48 > status page. > > > > > > —Files (please refresh)— > > > > Updated XML file: > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9914.xml > > > > Updated output files: > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9914.txt > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9914.pdf > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9914.html > > > > Diff files showing all changes made during AUTH48: > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9914-auth48diff.html > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9914-auth48rfcdiff.html (side by > side) > > > > Diff files showing only the changes made during the last edit round: > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9914-lastdiff.html > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9914-lastrfcdiff.html (side by > side) > > > > Diff files showing all changes: > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9914-diff.html > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9914-rfcdiff.html (side by side) > > > > Best regards, > > > > Karen Moore > > RFC Production Center > > > > >> On Apr 1, 2026, at 7:09 AM, Michael Richardson <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> > >> Michael, we now await your approval of the document. Once your approval > is > >> received, we will ask IANA to update their registries to match the > edited > >> document before moving forward with publication. > > > > Everything looks good to me. > > > >> Diff files showing only the changes made during the last edit round: > >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9914-lastdiff.html > >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9914-lastrfcdiff.html (side by > side) > > > > -- > > ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh > networks [ > > ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | IoT > architect [ > > ] [email protected] http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on > rails [ > > > > > On Apr 1, 2026, at 12:39 AM, Pascal Thubert <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Hello Michael and Karen > > > > Please consider figures 18 & 19 I proposed below with the tunnels more > isolated and the PDAO messages written in full. I believe that’s what we > need to solve Michael NS issues with those. > > > > A bientôt; > > > > Pascal > > > >>> Le 21 mars 2026 à 10:26, Pascal Thubert <[email protected]> a > écrit : > >> > >> Hello Michael > >> > >> The skew seems to be coming from tabs in my editor. > >> I reviewed your changes and have no issue with them. > >> > >> I believe that we need to add a P before or above the DAO the figure 18 > like below: > >> > >> 18 would become > >> > >> ------+--------- > >> | Internet > >> | > >> +-----+ > >> | | Border Router > >> | | (RPL Root) > >> +-----+ | P- ^ | > >> | | DAO | P-DAO-ACK | > >> o o o o | | | > >> o o o o Ingress o o o | ^ | Projected . > >> o o o o o \\ o o o | | P-DAO | Route . > >> o o o o \\ o o o o | ^ | . > >> o o o o o Egress o o v | P-DAO v . > >> o o LLN o o o | > >> o o o o o Loose Source Route Path | > >> o o o o v > >> > >> > >> figure 19 looked OK to me but maybe like below it is clearer? > >> > >> ------+--------- > >> | Internet > >> | > >> +-----+ > >> | | Border Router > >> | | (RPL Root) > >> +-----+ | P- ^ P-DAO-ACK > >> | Track | DAO | > >> o o o Ingress V | > >> o o o o o o X o X Source- > >> o o o o o o o X o o X Routed > >> o o o o o o X o X Segment > >> o o o o o o o o X X > >> Egress > >> o o o o o | > >> Target > >> o o LLN o > >> o o o o > >> all the best; > >> > >> Pascal > >>> Le sam. 21 mars 2026 à 02:50, Michael Richardson < > [email protected]> a écrit : > >> > >> Michael Richardson <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> I found though: > >> > >>> Figure 3 seems askew, the ^v route between S and D is hard to read. > >>> Figure 4 is better, but might also be better aligned. > >>> Figure 7 has skew and some other issues... like this line of ._- under > >>> "Southbound API" > >>> I checked .html and .txt to be sure it wasn't just the red/green > markup. > >>> Figure 18... not sure if there is a problem. > >>> Figure 19, definitely a problem. > >> > >> Hi, I edited the XML slightly, and put it here: > >> https://www.sandelman.ca/tmp/rfc9914-authors-fixed-figures.xml > >> > >> I think it fixes 3,4,19. > >> I fixed some things on figure 7. > >> I don't know if I got 18. > >> > >> -- > >> Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT > consulting ) > >> Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Pascal > > >
-- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
