2014-09-23 17:39 GMT-03:00 Dave Reisner <[email protected]>: > On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 05:22:52PM -0300, Pablo Lezaeta Reyes wrote: > > 2014-09-23 13:13 GMT-03:00 Marcel Korpel <[email protected]>: > > > > > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 4:22 AM, Det <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Enough of that already. Why I chose the "java-8-jdk" naming comes > from > > > the > > > > fact that "java-8-openjdk" sounds like we're trying to do > "java-<major > > > > version>-<project name>". The project name of JDK is not "Oracle > JDK", > > > and > > > > that's why I chose it. Now, OpenJDK apparently still calls these > > > projects by > > > > their "base name"[3], but _I_ would still prefer (read: I don't > > > "refuse"; I > > > > prefer) having packages called "jdk8-openjdk" and "jdk" that install > in > > > > "/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk/" and "/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-jdk/", > > > respectively. > > > > > > > > This also means we can currently do: > > > > > > > > $ man java-openjdk8 > > > > $ man java-jdk8 > > > > > > > > To access the man pages. > > > > > > For what it's worth, I support this naming scheme. > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > Marcel > > > > > > > I preffer ad a hyphen after the version as all the other arch packages do > > when is needed. > > so my vote is for : > > * java-openjdk-8 > > * java-jdk-8 > > > > -- > > *Pablo Lezaeta* > > All the other arch packages? Really? > > $ pacman -Ssq | grep -Ec '[^-][0-9]+$' > 322 > > $ pacman -Ssq | grep -Ec -- '-[0-9]+$' > 5 >
Ironically this show how bad I'm greep-ing, Well if is for follow the main rule go for the *java-openjdk8 and *java-jdk8 I will be happywhit this one specifically -- *Pablo Lezaeta*
