On Fri Sep 19 00:02:27 EDT 2014, Pablo Lezaeta Reyes wrote:
> but upstream name not necesary mean the name that the encapsulate that
> contain the package need to be named.
>
> There ar a handfull either throw arch and aur history and actual named
> packages that not follow the name.
>
> but too looking to the other packages in aur the version is alwas
separate
> from the name of the package so in the end <namepackage>-<version>
will be
> used.
> Upstream not give a version or give a "-" or a plain space for
versions if
> ou are going to follow uptream.
I'm sorry, but I didn't understand any of this.
Also, please don't top-post, as already stated.
Det
