2014-09-23 13:13 GMT-03:00 Marcel Korpel <[email protected]>: > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 4:22 AM, Det <[email protected]> wrote: > > Enough of that already. Why I chose the "java-8-jdk" naming comes from > the > > fact that "java-8-openjdk" sounds like we're trying to do "java-<major > > version>-<project name>". The project name of JDK is not "Oracle JDK", > and > > that's why I chose it. Now, OpenJDK apparently still calls these > projects by > > their "base name"[3], but _I_ would still prefer (read: I don't > "refuse"; I > > prefer) having packages called "jdk8-openjdk" and "jdk" that install in > > "/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk/" and "/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-jdk/", > respectively. > > > > This also means we can currently do: > > > > $ man java-openjdk8 > > $ man java-jdk8 > > > > To access the man pages. > > For what it's worth, I support this naming scheme. > > Kind regards, > Marcel >
I preffer ad a hyphen after the version as all the other arch packages do when is needed. so my vote is for : * java-openjdk-8 * java-jdk-8 -- *Pablo Lezaeta*
