Agreed, someone complained on one of my java packages that it was using the incorrect path for oracle java from the aur, and upon inspection I noticed these multiple packages providing the same thing, none of which work as they should be. I assumed they would have fixed it since that was only a short time after the new java common stuff, but it appears that they may need some assistance with that task.
Regards, Justin Dray E: [email protected] M: 0433348284 On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 8:18 AM, Pablo Lezaeta Reyes <[email protected]> wrote: > Since the new java-common come to the repo Is now possible have multiple > java, but this bring and open another issue, java naming scheme the guy in > jre/jdk[1] and jre-devel and jdk-devel refuse to follow a convention non > generic name and the other maintaining jre7/jdk7 [2] and > jre7-oracle/jdk7-oracle that do the same [3] refuse to accept or merge > jre7-oracle into jre7 for the same reason even if the jre-oracle was merged > into jre, this is a chaos. > Many packages doing the same in different verion having different name > conventions and ALL arguin bein correct. > > There is need to a conventional standar name scheme or this will be worst, > instead to be kiss this is sick. > There is a name scheme or name convention to follow? > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/jdk/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/jdk7/ > [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/jdk7-oracle/ > There is also a jdk5-compat. > Also mergins as ben posponed until name convention come. > > -- > *Pablo Lezaeta* >
