-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105166/#review14968
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Well done, I have some really smallish things.


tests/core/collections/TestCollection.h
<http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105166/#comment11769>

    Not really needed to test such dumb method, but why not, feel free to keep 
it.



tests/core/collections/TestCollection.cpp
<http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105166/#comment11768>

    Coding style says to use 0 instead of null, and there is 
KSharedPtr::isNull() which is the preffered one.


- Matěj Laitl


On June 21, 2012, 9:41 p.m., Jasneet Bhatti wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105166/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 21, 2012, 9:41 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Amarok and Sven Krohlas.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This patch implements a unit test for core/collections/Collection
> 
> There are abstract classes to be tested as well, which can only be done when 
> subclasses define the pure virtual functions. So tests for those will be done 
> along with the subclasses.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   tests/core/collections/CMakeLists.txt 2efd1fe 
>   tests/core/collections/TestCollection.h PRE-CREATION 
>   tests/core/collections/TestCollection.cpp PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105166/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Test passes on my repository
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jasneet Bhatti
> 
>

_______________________________________________
Amarok-devel mailing list
Amarok-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel

Reply via email to