The iginitenet basically required one. We have one of those, but the mount was different, and 60XR’s are almost entirely a complex curve, except a flat spot at the top. We’re not what you call experts, but we got it done anyway :)
> On May 29, 2025, at 3:43 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote: > > I never saw one, but was it something similar to this? > https://www.ignitenet.com/accessories/metrolinq-scope/ > > I have a vague recollection of Chuck supplying the mount and you provided > your own rifle scope? That could be a false memory though. > > From: AF <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Robert > Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2025 5:27 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Airfiber 60 Alignment > > So is there a link to the "WB scope" you all are talking about? > > Thanks > > On 5/29/25 12:52 PM, Bill Prince wrote: >> +1 >> Every time we used the WB scope, it was a win. Able to do 10 mile links with >> one person. >> bp >> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >> On 5/29/2025 9:46 AM, Nate Burke wrote: >>> Is the "Plastic Sight" Like the Cambium Alignment tube? Kinda works, but >>> at the same time, doesn't? The WB Scope was such a good idea, I don't know >>> why everything doesn't have that option. Especially on High precision >>> short links. Other than The manufacturer knows that guy's who install it >>> are usually paid by the hour. >>> On 5/28/2025 8:26 PM, Mathew Howard wrote: >>>> I haven't used any of the XRs, but I'm pretty sure there's no flat >>>> surface, so the WB scope probably isn't going to work. I assume the AF60XR >>>> comes with a plastic sight, like all the other UBNT 60ghz radios do these >>>> days, which is typically good enough to get you close enough fine tune >>>> with signal, and yes, the alignment brackets are pretty decent (again, I >>>> haven't used the XR, but I'm assuming it's similar to the others). They do >>>> have some beam forming, which makes them relatively easy to aim compared >>>> to other mmwave radios... they don't need to be anywhere near as precise >>>> as something like an AF24. >>>> >>>> The original AF60 is junk compared to the AF60LR, WaveLR and WavePro >>>> (especially the bracket, but also, in general). >>>> >>>> On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 4:21 PM Nate Burke <[email protected] >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>> We haven't used the UBNT 60ghz since the original AF60 between 2 >>>>> rooftops going across a street. We found it almost impossible to align, >>>>> but that was back in the day of the single U-Bolt alignment. I'm >>>>> looking at doing a temporary (1 month) 3 mile link from a tower to a >>>>> building with the AF60XR. Is it going to be hard to align the tower end >>>>> without 100 climbs? It looks like the alignment bracket is better now, >>>>> allowing for fine adjustments. With the AF24, we can strap the WB >>>>> Telescope on the front and align them right in with no question. I'm >>>>> guessing there's no flat surface to mount a scope on the AF60. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> AF mailing list >>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
