We didn’t use any alignment tool, besides squinting slightly and just experience. A tool would’ve been better though :)
> On May 28, 2025, at 6:26 PM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> wrote: > > I haven't used any of the XRs, but I'm pretty sure there's no flat surface, > so the WB scope probably isn't going to work. I assume the AF60XR comes with > a plastic sight, like all the other UBNT 60ghz radios do these days, which is > typically good enough to get you close enough fine tune with signal, and yes, > the alignment brackets are pretty decent (again, I haven't used the XR, but > I'm assuming it's similar to the others). They do have some beam forming, > which makes them relatively easy to aim compared to other mmwave radios... > they don't need to be anywhere near as precise as something like an AF24. > > The original AF60 is junk compared to the AF60LR, WaveLR and WavePro > (especially the bracket, but also, in general). > > On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 4:21 PM Nate Burke <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> We haven't used the UBNT 60ghz since the original AF60 between 2 >> rooftops going across a street. We found it almost impossible to align, >> but that was back in the day of the single U-Bolt alignment. I'm >> looking at doing a temporary (1 month) 3 mile link from a tower to a >> building with the AF60XR. Is it going to be hard to align the tower end >> without 100 climbs? It looks like the alignment bracket is better now, >> allowing for fine adjustments. With the AF24, we can strap the WB >> Telescope on the front and align them right in with no question. I'm >> guessing there's no flat surface to mount a scope on the AF60. >> >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
