It will be faster, especially when you get down to the last 6-10dB. > On May 28, 2025, at 2:35=E2=80=AFPM, Dev <[email protected]> = wrote: >=20 > It=3DE2=3D80=3D99s WAY better, we were able to get it to associate = with a =3D > rough aim at 7 miles, and only one tower crew, which kind of amazed = me. =3D > We then could bounce back and forth and fine tune both ends, I think =3D=
> we=3DE2=3D80=3D99re in mid 50s now after a few fine tunes. = We=3DE2=3D80=3D99re going =3D > to put some 11GHz, but that takes awhile to coordinate. I think maybe = =3D > they use the 5GHz failover to get close enough to start alignment. >=20 >> On May 28, 2025, at 2:20=3DE2=3D80=3DAFPM, Nate Burke = <[email protected]> =3D > wrote: >> =3D20 >> We haven't used the UBNT 60ghz since the original AF60 between 2 =3D > rooftops going across a street. We found it almost impossible to = align, =3D > but that was back in the day of the single U-Bolt alignment. I'm =3D > looking at doing a temporary (1 month) 3 mile link from a tower to a =3D= > building with the AF60XR. Is it going to be hard to align the tower = end =3D > without 100 climbs? It looks like the alignment bracket is better = now, =3D > allowing for fine adjustments. With the AF24, we can strap the WB =3D > Telescope on the front and align them right in with no question. I'm = =3D > guessing there's no flat surface to mount a scope on the AF60. >> =3D20 >> =3D20 >> --=3D20 >> AF mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >=20 >=20 > --=20 > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com -- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
