I could watch that all day.  In all, that was a pretty amazing test
flight.   Because of the belly flop, it has a separate tank used for the
landing burn.  Pressure in this tank was low so engine thrust was below
nominal resulting in a sub-optimal touchdown.  No leg deploy either but
this could be due to a timing issue from coming in too hot or not reaching
leg deploy speed until it was already in contact with the ground.  Guessing
they just need to bleed a little more heat into the header tank to keep
pressure up.  Should see SN9 fly this month.

On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 4:12 AM Matt Hoppes <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Stocks aren’t net worth unless you sell them though. Otherwise it’s
> speculative.
>
> Look at yesterday and probably today.
>
> On Dec 9, 2020, at 11:17 PM, Steve Jones <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> 
> Same applies to anything in ones net worth.
>
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2020, 9:21 PM Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> But if he sold all his stock, it would go down.  Schrodinger’s cat,
>> applied to stock valuation.  Don’t look in the box, don’t look, don’t look
>> … oh crap, you killed the cat.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* AF <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 9, 2020 9:00 PM
>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]>
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Starship launch again
>>
>>
>>
>> Odd, when I go to my bank, my assets are taken into consideration for
>> financing. Granted, Elon musk will never likely walk into my bank, and it's
>> likely the entirety of my lifetime financing is probably what he spends on
>> wristwatches a year, but i would venture a guess his financiers take that
>> into consideration
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2020, 7:31 PM Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> It kind of doesn't until you trade it for something or liquefy it.
>>
>> On 12/9/2020 8:09 PM, Steve Jones wrote:
>>
>> Odd that you think net worth has no value
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2020, 6:20 PM Matt Hoppes <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Say what now?  He gets nothing out of stock going up unless he sells
>> stock. And after today stocks are trashed for a bit.
>>
>> > On Dec 9, 2020, at 6:57 PM, Robert Andrews <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Oh the power of a skyrocketing stock price!   No issues with cash flow
>> there!
>> >
>> >> On 12/09/2020 03:46 PM, Chuck McCown via AF wrote:
>> >> I think that engine burning green was probably weaker than the design
>> thrust.  It still stuck the landing, and was motionless and vertical for a
>> half second.  But internal parts were probably moving downward due to the
>> lack of soft landing.  It is supposed to be able to land on 2 engines, so
>> the controller should have throttled it up.
>> >> Some software tweaks.  Musk estimated 1/3rd chance of everything going
>> right.  SN9 is ready to fly.  At least the belly flop maneuver looked
>> flawless.
>> >> *From:* Matt Hoppes
>> >> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 9, 2020 4:03 PM
>> >> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
>> >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Starship launch again
>> >> It did look like it came in a bit hot.
>> >>>> On Dec 9, 2020, at 6:01 PM, Bill Prince <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> 
>> >>>
>> >>> All I can say is cleanup in isle 3.
>> >>>
>> >>> That was awesome to watch. I thought they had it until the last few
>> seconds. It looked (to me) like they were coming in too hot.
>> >>>
>> >>> I also was wondering on the flight whether going from 3 engines to 2,
>> and then to 1 was an anomaly. Based on the fact that all 3 fired up again
>> on the landing that it was part of the plan.
>> >>>
>> >>> bp
>> >>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>> >>> On 12/9/2020 2:56 PM, Chuck McCown via AF wrote:
>> >>>> One of the engines was burning bright green the last 5 seconds or
>> so.  Burning copper based metal parts it appears.
>> >>>> But if you put it in .25 speed play and single step through the last
>> second or so, it stuck the landing.  It was at rest, vertical and then it
>> blew up.
>> >>>> *From:* Matt Hoppes
>> >>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 9, 2020 3:54 PM
>> >>>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
>> >>>> *Cc:* Chuck McCown
>> >>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Starship launch again
>> >>>> Boom.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> On Dec 9, 2020, at 5:23 PM, Chuck McCown via AF mailto:
>> [email protected] wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> 
>> >>>>> *https://youtu.be/ap-BkkrRg-o*
>> >>>>> --
>> >>>>> AF mailing list
>> >>>>> [email protected]
>> >>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>> >>>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> AF mailing list
>> >>> [email protected]
>> >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>> >>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> --
>> >> AF mailing list
>> >> [email protected]
>> >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>> >
>> > --
>> > AF mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
> --
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to