Hi, It means that the upstream repository would become github.com/zeromq/erlangzmq together with all the other implementations, and of course you'll become a member of the org and have full admin rights on that repository
On Aug 13, 2016 18:59, "Andriy Drozdyuk" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, Peter. > What did you mean by "bring the project into the ZeroMQ organization on > github"? > > Would I still be able to oversee the development process? In particular, > accepting patches, nominating contributors etc... > How does that work? > > Thank you. > > On Thu, 30 Jun 2016 at 12:39 Andriy Drozdyuk <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thanks Pieter. I've read all those things when I learned zmq :) I agree >> with what you're suggesting, but that model doesn't really work for me at >> this time. I was thinking of trying it this way for a year to see what >> happens in the future. >> >> Elliot, thanks for that distinction. I've never thought about that but it >> makes perfect sense. >> Regarding curve, that would be amazing. This was going to be my next >> goal. You can contact me at [email protected] so we can discuss it >> further. >> >> On Thu, 30 Jun 2016, 5:10 a.m. Elliot Crosby-McCullough, < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Andriy, >>> >>> Glad to see a full BEAM implementation. >>> >>> I've been working on something similar in Elixir (https://github.com/ >>> SmartCasual/elixir-zeromq) but since you've gotten further in Erlang >>> I'll take a look at contributing Curve support to yours instead, since all >>> I really wanted was native BEAM instead of a binding to the C library given >>> the dangers and/or inefficiencies of doing so. >>> >>> I'll have to look more closely into the licensing you've gone for to see >>> whether it's compatible with my needs. >>> >>> Small note, but what you've got there is an implementation not a binding >>> (which is a good thing). It would be a binding if it used e.g. the C >>> library to do the work. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Elliot >>> >>> On 28 June 2016 at 18:09, Andriy Drozdyuk <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> At Pieter's suggestion, I am putting this here: >>>> https://github.com/chovencorp/erlangzmq >>>> >>>> Native erlang 18 implementation of ZMTP 3.1 (including resource >>>> property), but without any security. >>>> >>>> Hopefully it will be useful to people. I know I'll use it myself - >>>> since all (native) erlang bindings are out of date. >>>> >>>> This is a six month young project, so this is NOT performance or >>>> otherwise tested at all, and I would appreciate any feedback (just take a >>>> second to file an issue). >>>> >>>> Thank you, >>>> --Andriy Drozdyuk >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> zeromq-dev mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> zeromq-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >> >> > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
