On 29 Jun 2016, at 01:21, Andriy Drozdyuk <[email protected]> wrote: > Interesting. I'm not married to AGPL, just don't want companies hogging any > patches they made.
I'm not an Erlang user, but if I needed bindings for a language and I saw an AGPL licence, I'd write my own bindings and release them with a BSD licence - I'd do that whether I was writing something open source or commercial. LGPL might fly if all you're worried about is ensuring patches to the project get recycled. Alex > > On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 at 16:28 Pieter Hintjens <[email protected]> wrote: > This is really cool. > > The license choice will IMO hinder community growth around the project > so I'd advise to you have a backup plan to switch to MPLv2 if the > commercial uptake isn't sufficient. > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Andriy Drozdyuk <[email protected]> wrote: > > At Pieter's suggestion, I am putting this here: > > https://github.com/chovencorp/erlangzmq > > > > Native erlang 18 implementation of ZMTP 3.1 (including resource property), > > but without any security. > > > > Hopefully it will be useful to people. I know I'll use it myself - since all > > (native) erlang bindings are out of date. > > > > This is a six month young project, so this is NOT performance or otherwise > > tested at all, and I would appreciate any feedback (just take a second to > > file an issue). > > > > Thank you, > > --Andriy Drozdyuk > > > > _______________________________________________ > > zeromq-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev -- Alex Bligh _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
