On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Alan Coopersmith <[email protected]> wrote: > If the server was moved to xcb protocol definitions (like we'd all like to see > so we can stop having every extension have it's own handwritten protocol > marshalling with the same byte swapping and integer overflow bugs in each),
I was tempted to mention this earlier in the thread, but didn't think I'd be adding much of value. :-) > would we then be merging all the xcb modules into the 'one module that the > server depends on' as well? xcb/proto is already a single git module, and I'm not sure any of the other modules would be useful to the server. So yes, if we just had server-side XCB, we wouldn't be having this conversation. :-) Jamey _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
