On 4/13/10 5:01 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
If the server was moved to xcb protocol definitions (like we'd all like to see so we can stop having every extension have it's own handwritten protocol marshalling with the same byte swapping and integer overflow bugs in each), would we then be merging all the xcb modules into the 'one module that the server depends on' as well?
I am a bit late to apply for GSoC, but that was one of my favorite project ideas last year and this year. Last year I started investigating how the current dispatch code works, how xcb is structured etc, I even have one or two branches with some code. Maybe I can work in it in my spare time (EVoC?).
tom _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
