The standard wants you to specialize things in std sometimes, and not other times... I’m not sure here’s clear guidance here. :(
On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 10:46 AM Maciej Stachowiak <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Sep 1, 2017, at 10:07 AM, Brady Eidson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > >> On Sep 1, 2017, at 9:46 AM, Maciej Stachowiak <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> Does RefPtr do anything for us today that std::optional<Ref> doesn’t? > >> > >> The obvious things would be: uses less storage space > > > > Grumble. If that’s true (which, thinking about it, of course it is true) > this is pretty much a nonstarter. So… nevermind. > > It might be possible to make a specialization of std::optional<Ref> that > avoids the overhead for a separate initialized bool. I'm not sure if it is > wise to write specializations of standard library template classes though. > > Regards, > Maciej > > > _______________________________________________ > webkit-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev >
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
