I recently worked on a patch where - because of the organic refactoring of the 
patch over its development - I ended up with a std::optional<Ref> instead of a 
RefPtr.

A followup review after it had already landed pointed this out, and it got me 
to thinking:

Does RefPtr do anything for us today that std::optional<Ref> doesn’t?

I kind of like the idea of replacing RefPtr with std::optional<Ref>. It makes 
it explicitly clear what object is actually holding the reference, and 
completely removes some of the confusion of “when should I use Ref vs RefPtr?"

Thoughts?

Thanks,
~Brady
_______________________________________________
webkit-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev

Reply via email to