> On Sep 1, 2017, at 10:07 AM, Brady Eidson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On Sep 1, 2017, at 9:46 AM, Maciej Stachowiak <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Does RefPtr do anything for us today that std::optional<Ref> doesn’t? >> >> The obvious things would be: uses less storage space > > Grumble. If that’s true (which, thinking about it, of course it is true) this > is pretty much a nonstarter. So… nevermind.
Even though I disagree with your proposal, I don’t think this is a good reason since we could create a template specialization for std::optional<Ref>. I think we could probably do that anyway since this type can arise through template instantiations (one place says std::optional<T> and something else sets T to Ref): https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=176228 <https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=176228> -Filip
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
