On 2018-02-16 11:18 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 16 February 2018 at 16:54, Derek Foreman <[email protected]> wrote:
commit d94a8722cb29d8b897672be66ff3c9ff79eab6fe
warned this was coming, back in 2013.

I've seen libraries that have wayland client and server using functions
in the same file.  Since struct wl_buffer still exists as an opaque
entity in client code, the vestigial deprecated wl_buffer from the
server include will generate warnings when not building with
WL_HIDE_DEPRECATED.

Signed-off-by: Derek Foreman <[email protected]>
---

Is there anyone out there this will hurt?

I'd like to at least see WL_DEPRECATED dropped from wl_buffer,
since it causes annoying build warnings when mixing client/server
code in the same files - even when not using the non-opaque
struct wl_buffer.

There are a few Mesa patches related this:

be52bd17ebf114e7ad16a6d9d0135cdbb0723cd0 - 17.3.0+

Not really related that I can see? I didn't touch struct wl_resource at all...

fa6b9be22c7a85a8766a31411caafdbe1694d7dc - 17.3.0+

Can't see how I could cause a problem here? WL_HIDE_DEPRECATED has always hidden struct wl_buffer, so compilation with WL_HIDE_DEPRECATED should be exactly as before.

66ebdfbd44cb62c58a7711fb72566f07d801809a - 17.2.3+ (stable port), 17.3.0+

We also provide a struct wl_buffer forward decl in wayland-server-protocol.h which is (autogenerated and) included from wayland-server.h

Presumably that patch was written for people not including wayland-server.h at all? They shouldn't have much trouble with eliding the full struct definition they weren't including.


Can you please double-check that Mesa continues to build fine, wit and
w/o the above patches?

I've test built mesa from the git 17.2 and 17.3 branches, as well as git master, and they seem ok... Building mesa is a bit of a dark art though, so hopefully no configure options changed, and I was building everything I thought I was.

If you want me to test build any specific SHAs, give me a list... I've got a reasonably fast computer here.

Thanks,
Derek

Thanks
Emil


_______________________________________________
wayland-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel

Reply via email to