2014-09-16 13:51 GMT+02:00 Pekka Paalanen <[email protected]>: > On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 13:26:12 +0200 > Alexander Preisinger <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi pq, > > > > I use it in my wayland-next branch (for unstable wayland stuff) of the > mpv > > player: http://mpv.io/ > > In this commit: > > > https://github.com/mpv-player/mpv/commit/77cc885b44a9e95e5c3c9ae4961b9958ff5cf643 > > Good to know, thanks. > > > I only just now realized that I should just use set_destination for my > use > > case. > > So setting the destination separately is definitely a use case and I > think > > the set request is redundant. > > True, but I'm worried how many upset people there will be if I break > the protocol during the migration by removing or renaming something. :-) > There should be no-one as it's all experimental still, but... > > I was just voicing my opinion for this question:
> - Should wl_viewport.set be removed as completely redundant? Maybe I understood it wrong? Best Regards, Alexander
_______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
