Hi pq, I use it in my wayland-next branch (for unstable wayland stuff) of the mpv player: http://mpv.io/ In this commit: https://github.com/mpv-player/mpv/commit/77cc885b44a9e95e5c3c9ae4961b9958ff5cf643
I only just now realized that I should just use set_destination for my use case. So setting the destination separately is definitely a use case and I think the set request is redundant. So far I really like the scaler extensions. But the scaling quality has lots of room for improvement. I thought about improving the scaling quality, but didn't had the opportunity to look into it. That's all from me. Best Regards, Alexander 2014-09-16 11:09 GMT+02:00 Pekka Paalanen <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > wl_scaler has been sitting in Weston for quite some time now: > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/wayland/weston/tree/protocol/scaler.xml > > I would like to collect comments and opinions on the protocol extension: > - Is it ready? > - Are the interfaces ok? As in, have a wl_viewport created for a > wl_surface, instead of having wl_surface argument on a global request. > - Are the names ok? > - Should wl_viewport.set be removed as completely redundant? > - Do we care about maintaining compatibility with the current wl_scaler > protocol, when moving it into Wayland? > > Obviously, if we change anything, it won't be compatible with the > current version. > > My goal is to move wl_scaler or equivalent into the Wayland repository. > That effort is now tracked at: > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83918 > > (Also that I wouldn't forget again, as I already did. :-p) > > I don't know how widely or little it has been used so far, so simply > pointing out projects that already use it would be nice, too. > > Originally, I was waiting for the Presentation queueing to mature a bit > before declaring wl_scaler as stable, because queueing seemed to > require a split in the scaler state. That split is there now, and while > I haven't really worked on Presentation for a long time, I do not see > further changes needed. And even this split was introduced in a > backwards compatible manner. > > I don't have a deadline for this, but now would be a good time to bring > out all your critique about the wl_scaler/wl_viewport extension on the > record. :-) > > > Thanks, > pq > _______________________________________________ > wayland-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel >
_______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
