Hi, wl_scaler has been sitting in Weston for quite some time now: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/wayland/weston/tree/protocol/scaler.xml
I would like to collect comments and opinions on the protocol extension: - Is it ready? - Are the interfaces ok? As in, have a wl_viewport created for a wl_surface, instead of having wl_surface argument on a global request. - Are the names ok? - Should wl_viewport.set be removed as completely redundant? - Do we care about maintaining compatibility with the current wl_scaler protocol, when moving it into Wayland? Obviously, if we change anything, it won't be compatible with the current version. My goal is to move wl_scaler or equivalent into the Wayland repository. That effort is now tracked at: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83918 (Also that I wouldn't forget again, as I already did. :-p) I don't know how widely or little it has been used so far, so simply pointing out projects that already use it would be nice, too. Originally, I was waiting for the Presentation queueing to mature a bit before declaring wl_scaler as stable, because queueing seemed to require a split in the scaler state. That split is there now, and while I haven't really worked on Presentation for a long time, I do not see further changes needed. And even this split was introduced in a backwards compatible manner. I don't have a deadline for this, but now would be a good time to bring out all your critique about the wl_scaler/wl_viewport extension on the record. :-) Thanks, pq _______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
