On Friday 20 March 2009 15:51:31 Stéphane Laurière wrote: > Hi Kjetil, hi everyone,
Hi! > I'm currently packaging Virtuoso for Mandriva, in the frame of Nepomuk > indeed (http://nepomuk.kde.org). I copied the current SPEC file there (the > subpackages need to be redefined though, taking into account your > suggestion, see my remarks below): http://mandriva.pastebin.com/m68576155 That sounds great! > Once done, I'll see with some Debian savvy friends whether they can create > the .deb as well. Great! As you noticed, I have my own package, partly work I've done myself, and partly done by Openlink, and there is a debian/ directory in the distribution. However, this package isn't very good, its just one package with everything, and everything is in /var/lib/virtuoso, so it needs a lot more work by someone who know Debian policy well. > As for the various sub-packages, I was wondering how to distribute the > files properly. Would you say the following is correct? Which distinction > do you do regarding virtuoso-core and virtuoso-server? Actually, I don't have that much knowledge of Virtuoso files in general, and not of Debian policy either, so I wouldn't know too much about this. > virtuoso-ose-server: > /usr/bin/* > /etc/virtuoso.ini I think I would have created a /etc/virtuoso/ directory, just in case more setup files will come up. > What do you think? It sounds good, but then, I think policy documents, that I don't know in detail would be pretty clear about this? :-) Kind regards Kjetil Kjernsmo -- Senior Knowledge Engineer Mobile: +47 986 48 234 Email: kjetil.kjern...@computas.com Web: http://www.computas.com/ | SHARE YOUR KNOWLEDGE | Computas AS PO Box 482, N-1327 Lysaker | Phone:+47 6783 1000 | Fax:+47 6783 1001
