RE: How to supress output

[Russell Johannesson]

It occurs to me that the problem under discussion isn't necessarily specific 
to ClearCase. Wouldn't any task which employs Runtime.exec() internally 
potentially be a source of unwanted output? Would it be reasonable to 
request that there be control over the exec output of all such tasks? That 
way, having ClearCase wouldn't be necessary for testing.

From: Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ant Users List <user@ant.apache.org>
Subject: RE: How to supress output
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:21:37 -0800 (PST)
...As for your testing the ClearCase changes, I
understand Steve's comments on that bug to say (and I
have said something similar to a user about running
the startup scripts on an obscure shell) that if we
get a submission that compiles, for something we can't
test, we can assume it works if the community reports
that as being the case.  It can then be added to an
existing optional task.  Note that this is exactly the
kind of situation that explains why we are loath to
add more optional tasks to Ant.
_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! 
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]