--- Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From: Russell Johannesson
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > It occurs to me that the problem under discussion
> isn't necessarily
> > specific
> > to ClearCase. Wouldn't any task which employs
> Runtime.exec()
> internally
> > potentially be a source of unwanted output? Would
> it be reasonable to
> > request that there be control over the exec output
> of all such tasks?
> That
> > way, having ClearCase wouldn't be necessary for
> testing.
>
> Sounds like a good idea. If you could nest
> <filterreader>s inside
> <exec>, you'd have some control over the output.
> Don't know how that
> would mesh with <redirector> through. --DD
>
redirector can apply filterchains to any or all of the
input, output, and error streams. I would say no task
should be using direct calls to Runtime.exec() but
should either be delegating to Execute or extending
ExecTask. The latter option would allow redirector
support fairly easily; the former would be more work.
-Matt
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 250MB free storage. Do more. Manage less.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
