From: "Dominique Devienne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Ant Users List" <user@ant.apache.org> To: "Ant Users List" <user@ant.apache.org> Subject: RE: How to supress output Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 14:09:33 -0600
> From: Russell Johannesson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > It occurs to me that the problem under discussion isn't necessarily > specific > to ClearCase. Wouldn't any task which employs Runtime.exec() internally > potentially be a source of unwanted output? Would it be reasonable to > request that there be control over the exec output of all such tasks? That > way, having ClearCase wouldn't be necessary for testing.
Sounds like a good idea. If you could nest <filterreader>s inside <exec>, you'd have some control over the output. Don't know how that would mesh with <redirector> through. --DD
Perhaps it could be done with filters. The <exec> task's output can be redirected with the output attribute. I was referring to any and all other tasks that may use Runtime.exec internally.
_________________________________________________________________
FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar – get it now! http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
