Sorry, I think you misunderstand. My comments were aimed at the Ubuntu
developer who prepared an update that was not acceptable for the reasons
I gave. My involvement was as a reviewer to uphold quality standards
within Ubuntu which apply to any change we make in stable Ubuntu
releases. This is necessary to ensure that we don't regress users. For
example, we must ensure that hg doesn't stop working in 24.04 next week
because of a careless change, so there must be a thought out QA plan to
ensure that this doesn't happen. This is orthogonal to the data loss
bug.

I believe we can still fix the issue - it just needs someone familiar
with Ubuntu packaging and process to prepare an update that meets our
quality standards. I will ask around for someone to do that.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2070443

Title:
  SRU: Fix critical regression in Mercurial 6.7.x < 6.7.4

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mercurial/+bug/2070443/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to